Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: HairOfTheDog

Please rephrase your question, because I'm not sure what you disagree with. I think the law is bad for hobby breeders (unwarranted government intrusion). I'm not sure what that has to do with puppy mills or pet shops. In fact, Florida already has a puppy lemon law that covers the health issue.
susie


23 posted on 03/20/2006 1:49:20 PM PST by brytlea (I'm not a conspiracy theorist....really.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: brytlea

I understand you don't want the intrusion. But you have to understand that the difference between 'hobby breeder' and 'puppy mill' is only perspective. One is a happy word and one is not. From the outside, few people could tell the difference unless they could inspect.

This law would allow for inspection and licensing action to be taken against breeders who do not maintain good standards.

It's relevant that FL has some kind of puppy lemon law... since this one speaks to medical reimbursement to the buyer (not just return for refund) and also to requiring sick animals get treated, I'm wondering is that new or redundant?


28 posted on 03/20/2006 1:56:21 PM PST by HairOfTheDog (Hobbit Hole knives for soldiers! www.freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson