There is nothing caustic or abusive about this thread.
It may be written is a sarcastic manner, but it expresses views no different at all then nearly all national commentators have expressed themselves.
We really should discuss the issues raised, regardless if hyperbole or sarcasm was used to get the point across. We are a conservative forum, and these points raised are conservative issues.
Writers and authors use literary tools all the time to make a point. We should not be hard on a fellow member if they use a style and literary tool to make his or her point either.
As I said, most conservative national commentators have stated these same points one way or another. THe views are based on facts of what has happened. WHere is the arguement? The style used???
I use sarcasm in some of my replies and don't bother with sarcasm "tags" but if a reader doubts my authenticity or conservatism, I have a track record of more than 10,000 replies that are available for anyone to check with a few mouse clicks.
All that having been said, it's not up to me to ban or let stand the author of this vanity. Up to now the mod has evidently made his/her decision in the matter and I don't question it.
It would be nice if the poster would offer a few comments to clarify his position.