It is not that I have ignored your website. I simply cannot access it due to problems with adobe acrobat. I tried. I will try to access the site and see if there is a way to view it without acrobat. I believe in looking at everything, because if I didn't, then my opinion would be an ignorant one. I will, however, tell you that of the 30 breeds of dog that have killed someone, labs are on there.
With that in mind, here is a list breeds that have caused at least one fatality within the past two decades:
Akita; Australian Shepherd; Boxer; Bulldog; Bullmastiff; Chesapeake Bay Retriever; Chow Chow; Cocker Spaniel; Collie; Coonhound; Dachshund, Doberman; Golden Retriever; Great Dane; Hound-"type" (may include crossbreeds); Husky; Japanese Hunting Dog; Labrador Retriever; Lhasa Apso, Malamute; Mastiff; Mixed-breed (where dog was known to be a mixed-breed, does not include dogs whose breed was not known); Newfoundland; Pit bull "type" (may include crosses or misidentified individuals); Pomeranian, Rhodesian Ridgeback; Rottweiler; German Shepherd Dog; Saint Bernard; Sheepdog; Sled-"type" (may include crossbreeds); Terrier-"type" (may include crossbreeds); West Highland White Terrier; Wolf/Dog hybrid, Yorkshire Terrier.
Another note. There is more than one very small dog breed on here, and this is just in the past 20 years. And I have to wonder. Not bashing your source, but if mine shows Labradors on the list of dogs which have caused fatalities in the last 20 years, and yours does not, it could be that the site you chose to post may have a biased author. My statistics were taken from an unbiased source which counts any and all attacks that are reported. Death being as serious as it is, and considering the unlikelihood of the author to have a secret malcontempt for labs, I will stand by my findings.
Also, something else that was quoted earlier:
Canine inflicted homicides have remained at the same general level (15 to 20 annually), which cannot be said for the number of dog bites, which is too high (5 million annually) and appears to be growing higher (see statistics, above). Considering the fact that there are 65 million dogs in the United States (see above), the homicide problem is minuscule. This is not to denigrate it, but to point out that eliminating it entirely would save only 15 to 20 people, out of the 5 million who are bitten by dogs.
If there were 15 deaths just by pit bulls last year, how come the number is roughly the same every year? I do believe those stats you found are unreliable.