Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Yo-Yo
I understand that most porn filter software blocks valuable medical information about breast cancer, uterine cancer, etc, so it needs to be disabled for certain people, but that is no excuse to reject filtering software outright.

Filtereing software is very restrictive. If you have ever tried to surf the internet that has been rendered "child-safe" you'd know. The computers at the Liberty Center on the navy base wear I work installed Net-Nanny and so many webpages were blocked that they wound up removing it. Now they just post signs saying if you are caught surfing porn, your CO will be notified. That seems to work a little better.

13 posted on 03/17/2006 7:54:28 AM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Drew68

That is a reasonable policy at a Naval Base's Library, but not for a public library open to school children.

As I posted earlier, I understand that the software needs to be disabled for some very legitimate searches. I just don't see that as an excuse not to use it at all.


14 posted on 03/17/2006 7:56:44 AM PST by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson