Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MojoWire

DPW was not going to BUY any of our PORTS. They were going to LEASE a limited number of TERMINALS. Meanwhile, the US of A would continue to be fully in charge of security of our PORTS. Please, if you want to engage in a debate on this get your facts straight. You must be getting your information from Hannity.


151 posted on 03/10/2006 8:04:36 AM PST by Don'tMessWithTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]


To: Don'tMessWithTexas
DPW was not going to BUY any of our PORTS. They were going to LEASE a limited number of TERMINALS.

Yeah, that's like saying the Philadelpha Phillies don't really own their baseball team because the MLB (Major League Baseball) REALLY has DEFACTO control over the teams and can nix and/or approve anything the Phillies front office wants to do.

As for your comment on the difference between terminals and ports, please dont be so condenscending.

Anyone who owns a terminal has control over which ships come to that terminal, and control over what cargo is removed, when and where, and who works at that terminal.

So don't give me this baloney that a terminal owner/operator is simply some innocent entity which has nothing to do with shipping goods into the USA, etc.

171 posted on 03/10/2006 10:33:09 AM PST by Edit35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson