Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: edpc
I guess we have a different definition of cheating. Personally, I consider placing wagers on your own team while being in a position to influence the game's outcome as a player/manager to be cheating.

The betting in question was at a time in which he was managing the Reds and had already been crowned hit king. Nothing in his stats suggest he didnt play his hardest during his playing days even if he was betting before managing unless you consider betting on yourself to succeed is harmful to one's game... but thats another discussion.

I don't think you can parallel Rose betting as a manager after his record was set with Bond's steroid induced HR chase that he will likely reach.

73 posted on 03/09/2006 7:22:24 AM PST by smith288 (http://angryprogrammer.typepad.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: smith288
I don't think you can parallel Rose betting as a manager after his record was set with Bond's steroid induced HR chase that he will likely reach.

The biggest problem Rose has is his incrementalism. First, (after over a decade of lying) it was betting on sports, but not baseball. Then it was baseball, but not his team. After that, it was for his team, but only to win. Given the track record of lies, he's not credible. We'll probably get the same from Barry down the road. He stands by not "knowingly" taking steroids, for now. That's likely to evolve into...."Well, it wasn't illegal at the time." That's my parallel.

75 posted on 03/09/2006 7:40:26 AM PST by edpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson