To: llevrok
So I guess the concept of respectfully disagreeing isn't part of the administration-loyalist handbook?
4 posted on
03/08/2006 5:49:06 PM PST by
thoughtomator
(I understand Democrats' impatience; If Kerry were President, Iran would have nuked Israel by now)
To: thoughtomator
Reagan's 11th Commandment - Do not eat your own party.
One could have been respectfully in disagreement with out shooting the POTUS in public.
Now let's see the GOP congress fight for their own political lives.
7 posted on
03/08/2006 5:53:34 PM PST by
llevrok
(The answer is often in the question.)
To: thoughtomator
Reagan's 11th Commandment - Do not eat your own party.
One could have been respectfully in disagreement with out shooting the POTUS in public.
Now let's see the GOP congress fight for their own political lives.
8 posted on
03/08/2006 5:53:36 PM PST by
llevrok
(The answer is often in the question.)
To: thoughtomator
Reagan's 11th Commandment - Do not eat your own party.
One could have been respectfully in disagreement with out shooting the POTUS in public.
Now let's see the GOP congress fight for their own political lives.
9 posted on
03/08/2006 5:53:44 PM PST by
llevrok
(The answer is often in the question.)
To: thoughtomator
I personally had no problem with the respectfully disagreeing, I have quite a lot of problem with the flame-throwers. They wanted 45 days to review, they got it and before the 45 days then turn and stab the President in the back. It's fine to feel pride over having stabbed the President in the back. I just wish they could muster that same "courage" to admit it now. Some are now trying to blame the Democrats, well not this time. That's intellectually dishonest.
11 posted on
03/08/2006 5:54:10 PM PST by
defconw
(Proud Member of the Bucket Brigade! Yes I am a Bushbot, so what of it?)
To: thoughtomator
Beware of bots having fits.
GW brought this on himself.
15 posted on
03/08/2006 5:55:32 PM PST by
dinok
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson