Which you obviusly have no objections over. That is the scary part. But only one of them is a current problem, as the Chinese aren't interested in Darwin or Apple in the least. They are interested in our free copies of Linux, which is a complete operating system, not a simple core, and one they get completely free, for their own infinite use.
Everybody with a product wants it to take over the market.>
So you don't have a problem with the "copyleftists" who want to "make all proprietary software obsolete"? They're "human", so their rights and wishes should be respected as equal to our own?
You seem to equate all open source proponents with Stallman, when in fact his following is small. Most people side with Linus, since most people aren't flaming leftists.
Torvalds did a complete 180 in less than a week on whether he will use Stallman's new license, if you call that standing up to Stallman no wonder you let him walk all over you too. Sorry to be so harsh but you are so weak in your defenses of these people I have no time to sugar coat it for you. Either you allow these leftists to continue to dominate open source, or you move to products that don't use their license. So far you seem totally content with Stallman/GPL exactly as is, so you should expect some harsh criticism.
This has been explained to you enough times before. Anyone in the world can use and build a Linux system. The Chinese put out Red Flag, which is based on freely available RH Enterprise source packages and Asianux.
Torvalds did a complete 180 in less than a week on whether he will use Stallman's new license, if you call that standing up to Stallman no wonder you let him walk all over you too. Sorry to be so harsh but you are so weak in your defenses of these people I have no time to sugar coat it for you. Either you allow these leftists to continue to dominate open source, or you move to products that don't use their license. So far you seem totally content with Stallman/GPL exactly as is, so you should expect some harsh criticism.
I just explained this to you a few weeks ago. Stallman's following is small (the FSF), the FSF is NOT the same thing as the OSS community as a whole--but a small section of it, the GPL v.3 is highly political, and Torvalds rejected the then-current draft handed to him.
Your "180 degree turn" wasn't a turn at all. Linus simply said he wouldn't rule out the new license--assuming major revisions were done.
Finally, what's with your obsession with China and Communism?
Yes, we know, we've heard it before, them getting operating systems is only okay if American businesses make money off of it.
So you don't have a problem with the "copyleftists" who want to "make all proprietary software obsolete"?
They don't really bother me because I know they won't succeed. The GPL3 draft is showing the rift between the ideologues and the rest of the world. They will marginalize themselves.
Torvalds did a complete 180 in less than a week on whether he will use Stallman's new license,
You need to keep reading. He says the draft as it stands now is unacceptable. He has never changed that position. But he, unlike you, recognizes that it is a draft and will change, so he can't rule out agreeing with the final version -- whatever that may be.
Sorry to be so harsh but you are so weak in your defenses
That's fine. It's easy to destroy your arguments since you don't do the most basic of research, as with Linus' positions.