Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Halfmanhalfamazing
Decent article. It is reasonable to think that internecine warfare (distro zealots) are at least partially responsible for Dell's position, yet at the same time they complain Dell doesn't support Linux on the desktop. There are portions of the Linux community who need to grow up and take a big-picture, real-world view.

"Microsoft has not talked to us about Linux. If they did, I wouldn't care. It's none of their business,"

Well, not anymore, since they were forced to cease monopolistic OEM licensing.

3 posted on 03/08/2006 6:59:46 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: antiRepublicrat

Agreed.


5 posted on 03/08/2006 7:32:36 AM PST by Halfmanhalfamazing (Linux, the #2 OS. Mac, the #3 OS. Apple's own numbers are hard to argue with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: antiRepublicrat

As an aside note, if Dell wanted to be a linux distributor there's nothing stopping them from rolling their own. They don't need red hat, novell, ubuntu, or whoever else.

Dell Linux. Red Hat's making money doing it. Surely Dell could as well.


6 posted on 03/08/2006 7:34:19 AM PST by Halfmanhalfamazing (Linux, the #2 OS. Mac, the #3 OS. Apple's own numbers are hard to argue with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: antiRepublicrat

Dell sees how terribly the "zealots" as you referred to them hate the world's richest man and other capitalists, and probably wants to steer clear of them. How could you blame him, when the best they have to offer is pennies on the dollar.


13 posted on 03/08/2006 10:03:50 AM PST by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson