I new you'd weasel out in that way. Wrong, you have no proof. The license specifically grants patent license to the software, and explicitly allows that software to be modified and redistributed (which allows a fork). Show me a provision in the license that rescinds the patent license in the case of a fork and I'll believe you. Tell me why you can fork MPL and not CDDL and I may believe you if you're rational.
Here, I'll be nice and give you a link to a Sun page showing their intent behind the CDDL, including the bit about how they wanted the patent issue to be easier for people (not harder, as you seem to think).
And of course why communists prefer GPL, and want to see our patent laws overturned.
Beside the point. And I don't believe even Stallman wants patent laws overturned. But I would also like to see a reversal of the judicial activism that allowed software to be patented in the first place.
I already showed you, in the license itself, which clearly indicates patent protections only exist for "original software", and a fork is certainly NOT original software.
As for Stallman, of course he opposes patents, and is very outspoken against them. How could any reasonable person think otherwise? Answer: they can't, since fighting them is one of his core philosophies. Quote from his website "Every software patent is harmful".
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/fighting-software-patents.html
Either you already knew this and are still a Stallman stooge, or you don't even understand the actual motives of his movement you continually and so bitterly defend.