I guess we'll need a shower after this thread gets going. ;)
1 posted on
03/02/2006 2:12:25 PM PST by
anymouse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
To: Bender2
I'm sure you will have some inappropriate comments for this thread. :)
2 posted on
03/02/2006 2:13:32 PM PST by
anymouse
To: anymouse
That's as good as an excuse as any.
3 posted on
03/02/2006 2:14:32 PM PST by
ShadowDancer
(No autopsy, no foul.)
To: anymouse
The new work could help test a hypothesis first proposed nearly 20 years ago, stating that sex evolved as a way to purge harmful mutations from a population.Good thing I'm in my 40's.
To: anymouse
This writer has it absolutely wrong. Sex was invented to keep women in their place.
[ducks to avoid frying pan]
To: anymouse
Or as my ex-wife would say "Why have sex"
6 posted on
03/02/2006 2:15:43 PM PST by
UB355
To: anymouse
Somehow I always seem to feel a bit dirty afterwards...
7 posted on
03/02/2006 2:15:56 PM PST by
corkoman
To: anymouse
...
concentrating many harmful mutations into single individuals... That is why the homosexuals should not be married.
Leave them single so they can fulfill their function.
8 posted on
03/02/2006 2:16:29 PM PST by
Dan(9698)
To: anymouse
Hey, baby, in the mood for a little negative epistasis tonight?
9 posted on
03/02/2006 2:17:59 PM PST by
colorado tanker
(We need more "chicken-bleep Democrats" in the Senate!)
To: anymouse
"Hey Honey, wanna get clean?"
To: anymouse
"Most mutations are actually harmful, so anything that helps populations get rid of their harmful mutations is going to be important," I've heard of some hokey pickup lines in my time but this one takes the cake.
To: anymouse
Turns out sex might have evolved as a way to concentrate lots of harmful mutations into individual organ Correction. ... might have been designed as a way ...
To: anymouse
According to their model, detailed in the March 2 issue of the journal Nature, negative epistasis is a natural byproduct of sex itself. Computer model... sounds reasonable.
18 posted on
03/02/2006 2:21:10 PM PST by
steveo
(There is absolutely nothing like the MAIN-frame of a dame....)
To: anymouse
This hypothesis, called the "mutational deterministic hypothesis," is controversial though, because it assumes that single mutations by themselves are only slightly harmful, while a combination of many mutations together is much more damaging. Scientists call this phenomenon "negative epistasis."
If negative epistasis were true, it would provide a powerful explanation for why sex has managed to persist for so long despite its numerous costs. But the phenomenon has yet to be widely demonstrated in nature and scientists have yet to figure out how such a thing evolved in the first place.
-----
a new computer model, cool.. this many help explain carville and matlin,, bill and hil and webb
some may well be pre-disposed to breed themselves out of existence. Good old Mother Nature.
20 posted on
03/02/2006 2:21:15 PM PST by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: PatrickHenry
21 posted on
03/02/2006 2:21:57 PM PST by
AntiGuv
To: anymouse
Soon as I get my graduate degree I'll come back and read it again and maybe understand it. :)
22 posted on
03/02/2006 2:22:39 PM PST by
jazusamo
(:Gregory was riled while Hume smiled:)
To: Millee
You know, after reading this I realize you're right. It is boring.
24 posted on
03/02/2006 2:23:13 PM PST by
Mike Bates
(Irish Alzheimer's victim: I only remember the grudges.)
To: anymouse
Oh goody! Now I know what to do with my "special purpose".
25 posted on
03/02/2006 2:23:35 PM PST by
jslade
(Liberalism ALWAYS accomplishes the exact opposite of it's stated intent!)
What a bunch of ridiculous nonsense.
26 posted on
03/02/2006 2:23:42 PM PST by
GretchenM
(What does it profit a man to gain the whole world and lose his soul? Please meet my friend, Jesus.)
To: anymouse
More evolutionist speculation and general hooey to explain the obvious presence of design throughout all creation.
27 posted on
03/02/2006 2:25:06 PM PST by
Elpasser
To: anymouse
You're not fully clean until you're sex fully clean.
28 posted on
03/02/2006 2:25:11 PM PST by
wolfman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson