Skip to comments.
Spying on Princess Diana? (Princess Diana's Driver Reportedly Was a French Spy)
ABC News ^
| Feb. 27, 2006
Posted on 02/28/2006 8:36:51 AM PST by presidio9
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
To: Wolfstar
The woman was remarkable for having married and dumped a simple-minded heir, and that's about it. Meanwhile she was raising at least one kid who thinks dressing up like a Nazi is funny and who is too stupid to foresee the field day the press is going to have with such an error.
61
posted on
02/28/2006 11:18:07 AM PST
by
presidio9
("Bird Flu" is the new Y2K Virus -Only without the inconvenient deadline.)
To: presidio9
The woman was remarkable for having married and dumped a simple-minded heir, and that's about it.That is NOT just about it. When she became the Princess of Wales and future Queen of England, had she not been a stupid, self-absorbed little slut, she could have done truly good things. There are so many ways she could have made a difference in this world. Instead, she made herself almost a caricature of the very worst our celebrity-besotted era has to offer.
62
posted on
02/28/2006 11:27:21 AM PST
by
Wolfstar
(I am sailing, home again 'cross the sea. I am sailing stormy waters, to be near you, to be free.)
To: Cecily
"Diana was every bit as pretty as Grace Kelly."
First of all, no one was as beautiful as Grace Kelly. Second, while Pricess Diana was pretty, she was by no means breathtaking.
Third, even had Princess Diana been the most beautiful woman in the world, I don't understand the media's fascination with her. She's like the female John F. Kennedy, Jr.
63
posted on
02/28/2006 11:51:30 AM PST
by
AuH2ORepublican
(http://auh2orepublican.blogspot.com/)
To: presidio9
64
posted on
02/28/2006 11:59:07 AM PST
by
LucyT
(All terrorist are muslim.)
To: presidio9
Catherine Deneuve, Audrey Hepburn and Grace Kelly are the most beautiful women of the second half of the 20th Century.
Sorry, Diana isn't even in their ballpark. She has a nose like Rocky Marciano. If she had not been married to that taxi-earred, doofuss twit Charles, a living, walking poster boy for monarchy free democracy, she'd be just another pretty Brit. I think QEII refuses to die before he does!
To: Shooter1001; AuH2ORepublican; Wolfstar; Churchillspirit; twigs
Incidently, I was just reading the NNDB profile of Barbra Streisand for another thread and it made me think about Diana:
with that enormous nose, Streisand is certainly not a classic beauty. But without getting too pompous it's fair to say that her popularity may have redefined what beauty is in American culture. She doesn't look like a star. Hell, she looks like any average woman you'd see at a laundromat. But coupled with the beauty that radiates from her songs, she sort of "becomes" beautiful, if you love the music. Substitute "love of music" for love of fairy tales, and that's what went on with Diana in American popular culture.
66
posted on
02/28/2006 12:21:06 PM PST
by
presidio9
("Bird Flu" is the new Y2K Virus -Only without the inconvenient deadline.)
To: AuH2ORepublican
You don't think Grace Kelly also had just a bit of help in the make-up, wardrobe, hairstyling, and perfect lighting department?
Both women are quite beautiful, and both had "it." Lots of people are/were fascinated by their looks and style. Diana and Grace came from similar backgrounds (plenty of money in the family to travel, get any kind of education, marry well, etc.), so I think Grace did much more to develop herself and her artistic talent. Diana seemed to be in the process of frittering away the goodwill and success she had achieved at the time she died.
67
posted on
02/28/2006 12:24:34 PM PST
by
Cecily
To: presidio9
68
posted on
02/28/2006 12:24:36 PM PST
by
Sloth
(Archaeologists test for intelligent design all the time.)
To: presidio9
Thank you!
Absolutely NO comparison.
69
posted on
02/28/2006 12:57:12 PM PST
by
wireman
To: 1Old Pro
Diana had to go! Can't have the mother of the bloody king of friggin England bouncing from bed to bed as a common trollop!
Charles will never be king, or if he does become so, he'll be the last! He's a boob, like his Nazi sympathizing great uncle!!
To: presidio9
Oh and BTW, if Slick Willie was spying on Diana via the CIA I'll give you one guess why a POTUS horny enough to chase a middle-aged woman around the White House to cop a few feels, would want to be aware of any of Diana's secret indiscretions.
HMMM???
To: presidio9
Oh and BTW, if Slick Willie was spying on Diana via the CIA I'll give you one guess why a POTUS horny enough to chase a middle-aged woman around the White House to cop a few feels, would want to be aware of any of Diana's secret indiscretions.
HMMM???
To: Churchillspirit
Sorry - Grace set THE STANDARD - you just don't get it.
Maybe you didn't see her in her time.
She was the most beautiful woman I have EVER seen.
73
posted on
02/28/2006 2:37:05 PM PST
by
Archer24
To: presidio9
Sarah Jessica Parker, who is flat-out horsey,Get that girl some oats!
74
posted on
02/28/2006 3:00:12 PM PST
by
fanfan
(I'd still rather hunt with Cheney, than drive with Kennedy.)
To: fanfan
Good idea. The feedbag would cover up her man-jaw.
75
posted on
02/28/2006 3:06:55 PM PST
by
presidio9
("Bird Flu" is the new Y2K Virus -Only without the inconvenient deadline.)
To: presidio9
76
posted on
02/28/2006 4:26:27 PM PST
by
fanfan
(I'd still rather hunt with Cheney, than drive with Kennedy.)
To: Shooter1001
Charles will be king and he won't be the last. Fortunately in this world, tradition stands for something. If I were voting, he wouldn't get my vote, but he will be king.
77
posted on
02/28/2006 5:01:17 PM PST
by
twigs
To: presidio9
As the saying goes Beauty is in the eye of the beholder .
78
posted on
02/28/2006 5:59:32 PM PST
by
Churchillspirit
(Anaheim Angels - 2002 World Series Champions)
To: Archer24
Check out the other posts on this thread. There are other contenders for the
most beautiful woman title. Although I do agree that Grace Kelly was beautiful.
My comments started by replying to a Freeper who considered Diana plain .
79
posted on
02/28/2006 6:03:46 PM PST
by
Churchillspirit
(Anaheim Angels - 2002 World Series Champions)
To: twigs
YOU DON'T VOTE FOR KINGS! M. Python.
Let's not have our knickers in a twist. I'm all for tradition. I say that William should be the next king somehow. Charles is such a twit, he'll bring the monarchy down, which would be a shame. Hmmm wasn't there a King Charles before this clown? And that other fellow named Oliver something-or-other?
Oh well, us yanks merely recall back to George III, who is the reason we don't have a king!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson