Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: mnehrling
Look at the history of the article talk and its edits like this one by a Berlet supporter:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chip_Berlet&diff=40994035&oldid=40984644

She wiped 3 paragraphs of Berlet making kooky "conservatives are Hitler" type quotes because they are embarassing to him. If you look at the discussion you will see that she did this at the behest of Berlet himself, who is Cberlet on Wikipedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AChip_Berlet&diff=40793224&oldid=40780352

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AChip_Berlet&diff=40947236&oldid=40937404

56 posted on 02/24/2006 8:40:54 AM PST by MrSanders
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: MrSanders

BTW, your post also reminds people that unless sourced and until verified, Wikipedia isn't to be relied on. I'm amazed how often present them as a definitive authority on Fr threads.


59 posted on 02/24/2006 8:51:45 AM PST by SJackson (There is but one language which can be held to these people, and this is terror, William Eaton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson