Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: r9etb
But once BobCo makes its in-house changes to its version of open-source ... which it's perfectly free to do ... then it has assumed a monetary stake in the outcome. The Open Source model does not account for that.

Forget "money," think "value," which is what really matters in capitalism. BobCo received value from the previous OSS programmers in the form of free code. BobCo then makes some changes and additions (which have value). BobCo then gives that value away, but is probably still ahead, since most likely it received more value that it gave.

In the closed-source model it's reversed. BobCo gives value (money) to get a license to modify and resell software, but keeps value in its modifications.

Now BobCo redistributes. JohnCo does the value thing the same, getting and giving value with its use of the original and additions. Now BobCo downloads JohnCo's improvements to its code. BobCo just received value again because somebody else improved its additions to the software. The only way BobCo was able to receive that value a second time was by giving value initially.

51 posted on 02/23/2006 9:33:05 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: antiRepublicrat

All companies benefit since they spend less time solving problems that other companies have already solved. Imagine if every company had to write their own indexing software instead of simply using a package, like Lucene.


57 posted on 02/23/2006 9:50:56 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson