Oh for Pete's sake. In her dormitory room? Yeah, yeah. And no always means no.
And by the way, we know his name. We don't know her name. If he is not convicted, we still know his name, and we don't know her name. Point: young men next to young other humans, especially female, provokes young dormitory activities. When it's your tax dollars at work paying for this situation, well.....
The name will become a matter of publice record.
I bet it already is.
Its just that the "journalists" choose not to print it.
The charge sheet has the name.
The Article 32 is a public adversarial hearing unless the defense requests otherwise.