Whoa! What an eye opening article!
Posted on 02/16/2006 6:34:26 AM PST by veronica
LOS ANGELES (AP) - Bad Academy Awards puns are flying. There's the ``Brokeback backlash'' ... the little film that ``crashed'' the party ... the one about ``Brokeback Mountain'' peaking too early.
While the cowboy love story ``Brokeback Mountain'' has been established as a solid favorite for the best-picture Oscar, the ensemble drama ``Crash'' has an ardent following and some late-season momentum that could make it a surprise winner.
When there's a clear Oscar front-runner, that film almost always goes home with the big trophy, but upsets do happen and late-surging films have pulled off come-from-behind wins.
Just look back to the 1998 awards season.
``The year of `Saving Private Ryan,' everybody was certain it was a lock,'' said film historian Leonard Maltin. ``People thought it was a sure thing to win best picture given the subject matter (D-Day heroics) and the people behind it (Steven Spielberg and Tom Hanks), until the middle of December.''
That's when a little film called ``Shakespeare in Love'' showed up. Oscar voters, along with everyone else, fell in love with it, and while Spielberg won best director, ``Shakespeare in Love'' grabbed the top prize.
The previous 77 Oscar ceremonies have had their share of unexpected twists, mostly in the acting categories. The best-picture announcement often has proven an anticlimactic no-brainer at the end of the evening, yet a handful of unanticipated winners have shaken things up:
For best picture of 1948, the poignant drama ``Johnny Belinda,'' a homegrown Hollywood production, seemed to have the edge, only to lose to a British upstart, Laurence Olivier's ``Hamlet.''
Three years later, the song-and-dance romance ``An American in Paris'' pulled off a best-picture stunner over dramatic heavyweights ``A Place in the Sun'' and ``A Streetcar Named Desire.''
The next year, Gary Cooper's Western ``High Noon'' looked as though it would ride into the winner's circle, but the splashy circus tale ``The Greatest Show on Earth'' came out on top.
The 1968 best-picture award went the musical route again as ``Oliver!'' became an upset winner over the more popular musical ``Funny Girl'' and the palace-intrigue saga ``The Lion in Winter.''
And one of Oscar's biggest underdogs, the Olympics tale ``Chariots of Fire,'' ran off with best picture for 1981 over the historical drama ``Reds'' and the family story ``On Golden Pond.''
This time around, most signs point to ``Brokeback Mountain'' - Ang Lee's tale of two rugged Western men (Heath Ledger and Jake Gyllenhaal) in a doomed love affair - as the likely best-picture champ.
Since it debuted in December, ``Brokeback Mountain'' has swept through awards season, winning best drama at the Golden Globes, snagging honors from top critics groups and earning prizes from guilds representing directors, writers and producers.
The film leads the Oscars with eight nominations, positioning it as the one to beat come March 5.
``Brokeback Mountain'' has followed the same release pattern as 2004's Oscar champ, ``Million Dollar Baby,'' starting in a handful of theaters and gradually expanding into wide release and box-office success on the strength of its awards buzz.
But ``Crash'' grabbed the prize for best overall cast performance at the Screen Actors Guild Awards, surprising some Oscar forecasters. Because of its supposed momentum, ``Brokeback Mountain'' had been considered a favorite there, too.
After the fact, though, the SAG honor made sense for ``Crash'' - its huge cast and multiple story lines are the virtual definition of an ensemble film. Directed by Paul Haggis, a 2004 Oscar nominee for the screenplay of ``Million Dollar Baby,'' ``Crash'' features Sandra Bullock, Don Cheadle, Brendan Fraser, Terrence Howard, Thandie Newton and supporting-actor nominee Matt Dillon among dozens of characters whose lives intersect over a chaotic 36-hour stretch in Los Angeles.
``The reason we believe we have a great chance of actually winning the best-picture Oscar is because people are passionate about the movie,'' said Tom Ortenberg, president of Lionsgate Films, which released ``Crash.'' ``With all due respect to the other best-picture nominees, all of which are terrific and of great merit, there's a sense that people admire and respect the other nominees, but they are passionate about `Crash.'''
``Crash'' took an unusual route to the Oscars, emerging out of the 2004 Toronto International Film Festival, where Lionsgate snapped up the film. The movie hit theaters last May and came out on DVD in September, defying conventional wisdom that films released early in the year get forgotten by Oscar time.
Lionsgate took the singular step of providing about 100,000 DVD copies of ``Crash'' to SAG members to ensure that as many as possible had seen the film before voting for the guild's awards. Distributors generally provide about 20,000 to 30,000 DVD copies of awards-contending films to academy members, key critics groups and voters in other Hollywood honors, but this was the first time a group as big as SAG was blanketed with DVDs of a movie.
Tom O'Neil of the awards Web site theenvelope.com said the SAG win was a sign that ``Crash'' could be picking up steam as a potential best-picture party-crasher among the Oscars' 5,800 voters.
``Brokeback Mountain'' has become a cultural touchstone for Hollywood depictions of gay love affairs, yet the hubbub over the film may be growing stale as Oscar voters cast their final ballots, O'Neil said. And while ``Brokeback Mountain'' has become a solid box-office success, the gay theme may be off-putting to some Oscar voters, he said.
``Statistically, we know the vast majority of Oscar voters must be straight if they're at all representative of the general population,'' O'Neil said. ``As much as they admire this movie, it may not feel like it's their movie. If there is homophobia in Hollywood, it could manifest itself there. Or they could just be sick of gay cowboy jokes.''
James Schamus - a producer on ``Brokeback Mountain'' and co-president of Focus Features, which released the film - declined to comment on his movie's front-runner status or the prospects of ``Crash'' becoming an underdog spoiler.
Schamus, previously involved with such Oscar contenders as ``The Pianist'' and Lee's ``Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon,'' said it's impossible to calculate a movie's awards fate based on such insubstantial notions as ``momentum and peaking.''
``That allows us to actually pretend we have some clue of what's going on,'' Schamus said. ``But if you go back and do a statistical analysis of all that talk about momentum and whatever, then line it up against the outcome of the Oscars themselves, you'll find the relationship of those things is completely and utterly serendipitous. There's no cause and effect. There's no science to it.''
And of course, there are three other worthy films in the best-picture race, the Truman Capote drama ``Capote,'' the Edward R. Murrow tale ``Good Night, and Good Luck'' and the assassination thriller ``Munich.''
Along with ``Crash,'' any one of those movies could pull off a win over ``Brokeback Mountain,'' Maltin said.
``Anyone who says that someone is a sure bet for an Oscar is a fool,'' Maltin said. ``There's no such thing as a sure thing, least of all in a five-way vote.''
Race Card or Homo Agenda
decisions,....decisions.
Who cares?
Have you seen Crash? It in no way plays "the race card." Quite the opposite.
Actually, I thought the movie showed racism in all its forms, not just white people.
Not a chance.
Whoa! What an eye opening article!
"Crash" was the only movie of the five nominated that I have seen, and it is an excellent movie. Right form the start I knew this movie was different. It has two black men lamenting the black stereotype. How people think they are nothing but crooks, etc. And how none of ity is their fault. Then they go and mug and carjack a white couple. I really hope this beat "Bareback Mount-him" for Best Picture. Of course, if it does, will gays and lesbians boycott Hollywood because their movie didn't win?
Have you seen Crash? It's hardly a typical "Race Card" propagand. I had other qualms with it (it's pretentious, when the film opens w/ one of the lead actors staring into the audience and pontificating on the human situation in poetic verse w/ the main metaphor being the title of the film, the film's a little too in love with itself), but it doesn't have the leftwing agenda as the other Oscar films do.
Never watched it, never will
neither of them.
I still haven't seen "Titanic"
That's what I think of Oscar
Anyone who comments on this thread, I would imagine. :) Books, films, art - they are part of a well-rounded life, IMO. And there is a political element in most art. But don't feel compelled to comment, if you don't agree.
I'm thinking the celebration of a man's betrayal of America (Good Night and Good Luck) can give humpback mountain a run for it's money. Sure, both hit popular themes in Hollywood, but I think there is just something about the timeless story of selling out one's country to a brutal communist dictatorship, that the Oscar Voters won't be able to resist.
Boy, you nailed it!
LOL!
Crash was a cheap rip-off of Magnolia.
Besides, they gotta give cLooney, or some obnoxious Leftist, a chance to act like an @ss at the podium
Haggis hates the "Bush regime" and us conservatives...
It's a good movie, and it is NOT the "race card." That's what you THINK when you first start, but the success of this movie is to show that things are not what they seem, and supposed "racists" are no such thing, while supposedly open and tolerant liberals are racists. I strongly endorse this one---the only one of the Academy Award-nominated films worth seeing. Matt Damon gives a great performance.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.