[bobdsmith]

You're getting smarter Bob, now you should be able to look at your explanation and see why talk of evolution in this regard is laughable. The long legged among any species should be able to walk faster, but that fails to prove an advantage in getting there, and has nothing to do with evolution.

It's not just that it can walk faster, but it can cover more ground. As the article mentions the faster frogs are able to cover more ground per year than the frogs could decades ago. It stands to reason that the type of frogs furthest from ground zero will be of the faster variety simply because the slower types cannot get that far. Fast frogs produce more fast frogs. So it makes total sense that the front line should be dominated with fast frogs.

[editor-surveyor]

Yes Bob, it does make sense that the front line is dominated by long leg frogs, just as the olympic broad jump teams are dominated by long leg men, but neither has any relationship whatsoever to the dreams of evolutionists.

Their ability to get there first is simply a mechanical fact that has existred since they were created, but still isn't 'evolution.'