[SteveMcKing]

Being abused by a priest or a babe are very different experiences.

There should be a bias, it's a good sign.

[Coleus]

Being abused by a priest or a babe are very different experiences.

There should be a bias, it's a good sign. >>

Babe? most of the school employees abusing students are male. And do you think it's right for a female teacher to prey on a boy in school?

and you think it's good for a male teacher who abused a female student should get more jail time than a female teacher abusing a male student? That's a good sign? I don't understand your rationale.

[TheCrusader]

"Being abused by a priest or a babe are very different experiences."

A "babe"? what a screwed up thing to say; as though most of these cases weren't against male teachers. And for those "babes" who like to diddle with littly boy's penises, they're as disgusting as any other pervert.

During the Catholic priest scandal, the Dallas Morning News reported that over six hundred Texas teachers from 1997 to 2003 were fired, reprimanded, or arrested for sexual abuse of children. This is why the priest abuse scandal was a huge media hype, because they never took sexual abuse by other denominations' clergy, or other profession into account for a proper context. And sexual abuse of minors within these other professions makes the Catholic priest scandal pale in comparison. But to the anti-Catholic bigots, I suppose the liberal media only picks on Republicans and leaves other conservative institutions alone; barf.