Replies

Bill O'Reilly was 100 percent correct tonight.

For those of you who missed the show, Bill highlighted the fact that the NYT and other rags are refusing to post the Mohammed images in their pages.

He also highlighted the fact that the NYT is willing to print images of the Virgin Mary covered in dung and pornographic photos.

Bill's challenge to the NYT is why be so biased against Christianity? Why print images of the Virgin Mary covered in animal dung, but then REFUSE to print images of Mohammed with a bomb in his turban?

ANSWER: MORE DOUBLE STANDARDS FROM THE SCUMBAGS AT THE NY TIMES, AND HYPOCRISY FROM THEIR IDIOT APOLOGISTS.

7 posted on 02/08/2006 7:04:32 PM PST by Emmet Fitzhume (The maniacal zombies in the film "Dawn of the Dead" have much in common with Muslims.)

To: Emmet Fitzhume

Bill O'Reilly was 100 percent correct tonight.

By highlighting things that HAVE ALREADY HAPPENED, yes - he is 100% right.

C'mon - y'gotta do better than THAT…

8 posted on 02/08/2006 7:15:43 PM PST by solitas (There is but One God, and mohammed is a goat molester.)

To: Emmet Fitzhume

What caught my attention was that the guest from Editor and Publisher agreed with Bill that the reason was that the papers were afraid, physically afraid, of the muslims.

9 posted on 02/08/2006 7:21:05 PM PST by Leisler (Islam Macht Fries!)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794