Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Junior_G

The first photo is irrelevant due to the angle ...

the second?

When did Ben have laces stitched onto his arm? lol


35 posted on 02/08/2006 5:30:30 AM PST by mcg2000 (New Orleans: The city that declared Jihad against The Red Cross.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: mcg2000
When did Ben have laces stitched onto his arm? lol

Are you kidding? You think that three-inch wide patch of white is laces on a football? The whole point of the previous photo is that it proves that it is Ben's white wristband on his arm, not laces on a flesh-colored football.

42 posted on 02/08/2006 5:33:01 AM PST by Junior_G
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: mcg2000
"The first photo is irrelevant due to the angle ..."

I understand what you are saying but I disagree. It's difficult because of the angle but when you break it down you see that the plane that is broken stems from the part of the goal line that continues off the bottom edge of the photo. The part of the line that you can see is actually to Ben's right. Project the plane from there would be incorrect.

I felt sure that the ball had broken the plane before, now I know it did.
69 posted on 02/08/2006 5:43:07 AM PST by Lee'sGhost (Crom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: mcg2000

The first photo provides context for the second. In order to believe your analysis of the photo you posted, you have to refute the positioning of the ball in the QBs arm (as shown in the first photo to clarify the second).


73 posted on 02/08/2006 5:46:29 AM PST by MortMan (Trains stop at train stations. On my desk is a workstation...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson