Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Super Bowl: Picture Proof of Big Ben's TD
Fox Sports Pittsburgh ^ | February 7, 2006

Posted on 02/08/2006 5:18:46 AM PST by mcg2000



TOPICS: Sports
KEYWORDS: blurryinconclusive; nfl; pittsburgh; seahawks; seattle; steelers; superbowl; touchdown; whocares
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 281-291 next last
To: hadaclueonce
I am an offical and I do not know the difference between a "block" and a "tackle"? NFL officals 101, I learned this very early, when you have the ball, you "block." When the other team has the ball you "tackle."

The rule is that members of the team without the ball on a return are not allowed to take out blockers below the knee. It's called a "low block", for whatever reason. And it's there to protect the players.

Where it was a ball call wasn't in calling it a "low block", but rather that Hasslebeck 1) was actually trying to tackle the ball carrier, 2) didn't make contact with a blocker, and 3) was doing what QBs are coached to do, i.e., go down low to make the tackle to avoid taking a hit in the shoulder.

141 posted on 02/08/2006 8:56:25 AM PST by kevkrom ("...no one has ever successfully waged a war against stupidity" - Orson Scott Card)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: toldyou
I just can't believe you people.

But I Believe you and what you say. So, he DID make a TD.

142 posted on 02/08/2006 8:57:05 AM PST by ExcursionGuy84 ("Jesus, Your Love takes my breath away.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: N. Theknow
Let's start a poll. Which sucked worst at Super Bowl XL?

I'll go with D) the incessant whining of the Seahawks fans about the officiating while ignoring the bad calls and non-calls that went against the Steelers

143 posted on 02/08/2006 8:58:33 AM PST by kevkrom ("...no one has ever successfully waged a war against stupidity" - Orson Scott Card)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003; new cruelty
When a QB slides feet first the ball is down at at the ball spot when he BEGINS the slide.

The tradeoff being that no one is allowed to hit him when he does so. (Allowances should made for players already "committed" and unable to change momentum.)

144 posted on 02/08/2006 9:00:20 AM PST by kevkrom ("...no one has ever successfully waged a war against stupidity" - Orson Scott Card)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Wyatt's Torch

bump


145 posted on 02/08/2006 9:01:28 AM PST by foreverfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: commish
The only bad call against Pittsburgh was the Non-call on the clear Block in the Back of Rothlesberger after the interception.

Well, there was also the "incomplete" Stevens catch-and-fumble and the incorrect overturning of Hasslebeck's fumble (by rule, he was not down by contact, but the referee blew the call on the replay).

146 posted on 02/08/2006 9:02:53 AM PST by kevkrom ("...no one has ever successfully waged a war against stupidity" - Orson Scott Card)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: toldyou
Apparently someone needs to be told that there is no requirement for a little blue circle to cross the plane of the goal.

147 posted on 02/08/2006 9:05:46 AM PST by Beowulf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: usmcobra
It is my belief that the endzone is inside the lines hence the term "breaking the plane of the endzone"

This is incorrect. The end zone begins at the line. The outside edge of the line. This is fundamental football.

Now, in ice hockey, the puck must completely cross the goal line in order for it to be a goal.

But this isn't hockey.

SD

148 posted on 02/08/2006 9:09:18 AM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Beowulf

LOL!


149 posted on 02/08/2006 9:10:27 AM PST by toldyou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: hadaclueonce
NFL officals 101, I learned this very early, when you have the ball, you "block." When the other team has the ball you "tackle." NFL Officials now owe me a $10,000 consulting fee.

Try looking at the rule book sometime. The Steelers, during the regular season, had this rule called on them at least once.

It didn't make sense to me, either, but it is in the rules. When defending an interception like that, you are not allowed to go low on a blocker, or attempt to do so.

Since Hasselbeck dove near the blockers legs, he got called for it. I agree it's a dumb rule, but it is the rule, and Steeler fans learned it this season.

Now you've learned it as well.

SD

150 posted on 02/08/2006 9:12:24 AM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
Exactly, the ref gave them the TD because Ben wisely slide the ball forward after he was down.

Just not true.

151 posted on 02/08/2006 9:16:33 AM PST by Petronski (I love Cyborg!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Junior_G

If you have trouble with verb tense, protest to your teachers or seek remedial education.


152 posted on 02/08/2006 9:21:36 AM PST by Petronski (I love Cyborg!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: mcg2000

Hand it over to Chloe. She'll tune the focus down till it is fine as frog's hair.


153 posted on 02/08/2006 9:25:25 AM PST by freedomlover (The only reason you are still conscious is because I don't want to carry you. - Jack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

How can you say Ben didn't slide the ball across the line after he was down? Perhaps you are referring to a different game?


154 posted on 02/08/2006 9:33:01 AM PST by Junior_G
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Junior_G
How can you say Ben didn't slide the ball across the line after he was down?

I didn't say that.

But that late effort was not the source of the TD call.

155 posted on 02/08/2006 9:35:21 AM PST by Petronski (I love Cyborg!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
Just not true.

You are entitled to your opinion. It is just contradicted by the evidence and logic. Spotting the football is not a science. Most spots on any given play is off by a foot or so. Why can't you just accept that? The ref was fooled. It was a good move by Ben to scoot the ball over the line. Nothing wrong with that. It was Seattle's fault for letting the Steelers get that close in the first place. You can't fault the ref for making a human judgement.

156 posted on 02/08/2006 9:36:22 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
Why can't you just accept that?

I accept that refs make spotting errors, but it's not relevant in this case: the ref wasn't fooled, the touchdown had already been scored by the time Ben landed and then reached forward with the ball.

You can't fault the ref for making a human judgment.

Why would I fault him? He got it right.

157 posted on 02/08/2006 9:41:02 AM PST by Petronski (I love Cyborg!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: Junior_G
I don't think the Steelers fans would be complaining about it at all if they felt secure about the victory. Whether they'll admit it or not, I think most of them wish they had won without so much help from the officials.

I know I would have been embarrassed with the victory if the Colts came back and won the game against Pittsburg. But in reality there is nothing to be ashamed about. It was Seatle's defense who let Pittsburgh get within an inch of the goal line. If a ref makes a call and gives them a touchdown, so what. Who allowed the other 99.97 yards?

158 posted on 02/08/2006 9:41:32 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

Not to mention, what's saying that Pittsburgh doesn't score on 4th-and-an-inch on the next play, anyway, even if the original call had been that he was marked short (and not overturned by replay)?


159 posted on 02/08/2006 9:43:27 AM PST by kevkrom ("...no one has ever successfully waged a war against stupidity" - Orson Scott Card)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
Why would I fault him? He got it right.

Then why doesn't one of the hundred of video cameras and thousands of photographers have one picture of the ball breaking the plane???? Probably because he either missed by an inch or his arm was in the way. The is great video evidence, but none shows the ball breaking the plane. It would have been absolutely impossible for the line judge to see the ball breaking the plane from 20 yards away. The line judge only saw the ball in the end zone when he ran up after the play was dead. I am absolutely correct on this and you have zero evidence that refutes it. I really don't see it takes away from the Steelers victory, Seattle let them get that close, it is their own damn fault for allowing the TD whether Ben crossed the plane or not. You can't count on a ref for a perfect spot.

160 posted on 02/08/2006 9:47:53 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 281-291 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson