Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dfwgator

Yeah, interpretation, interpretation, interpretation. Entire ball. It's definitive. If it's good enough for the NHL (entire puck has to cross the red line for a goal), it should be good enough for the NFL.

What is the origin of this plane rule? Pile-up on the goal-line with a QB/RB/FB extending the ball (i.e., no one touching the ground)? Minimizing injuries (e.g., Marcus Allen flying over a pile into the endzone)?


66 posted on 02/06/2006 7:14:08 AM PST by goarmy (WARNING: The consumption of alcohol is a major factor in dancing like a retard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: goarmy
What is the origin of this plane rule?

It has to do with how they spot the ball for the next play. If any part of the ball is in the end zone (and the lines are part of the end zone), then they would be spotting the ball in the end zone for the next play. Ridiculous, no? Ditto for safeties -- if any part of the ball remains in the end zone, it's a safety.

71 posted on 02/06/2006 7:17:45 AM PST by kevkrom ("...no one has ever successfully waged a war against stupidity" - Orson Scott Card)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson