[F. dAnconia]

Your post says "..they (Pit) had it given to them". If that is what you meant...then you are wrong...regardless of how many years you have been watching football.

25 years has not taught you to objectively look at team's strength. I hate Pittsburg myself. However, they are clearly the better team by every measure.

[Echo Talon]

I hate Pittsburg myself. However, they are clearly the better team by every measure.

Yea, Ben Roethlisbergers 22.22 QB rating was AWESOME! give Seattle the 14 points they should have had and take away the 7 that the refs gave pit and then tell we what the score should be

[TheClintons-STILLAnti-American]

" I hate Pittsburg myself."

Pittsburg is in Kansas, and is far too small a town to have a pro team of any sort.

PITTSBURGH,however, although they played poorly, managed, as you attest, to show that even on their worst day they can beat the best the NFC has to offer.

Not to mention showing their coach to be far less than the tactical genius many would have us believe him to be...talk about choking at the end of the halves.

Maybe his team won't be so much like little boys hanging on every word of their hero anymore.

[Echo Talon]

25 years has not taught you to objectively look at team's strength. I hate Pittsburg myself. However, they are clearly the better team by every measure.

See you go off spouting things that you cant back up, by every measure? Wasn't Seattle the #1 ranked offense? Is that not a measure? Didn't Seattle lead the league in sacks? Is that not a measure? Seattle lead in time of possession. is that not a measure? Seattle got more 1st downs, again i guess that isn't a measure. More Net yards(396-339), more plays(77-56), less turnovers.... other than that by ever other measure. The 14 points robbed from them and the 7 points given to Pit. Oh and the 7-3 penalty differential.