Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SC Swamp Fox

*gasp*


189 posted on 02/05/2006 12:19:58 PM PST by Klutz Dohanger (Folding - Help science, as you browse the web. Team#36120)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies ]


To: Klutz Dohanger
*Snort - now they think we're falsifying the results:

berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Sun Feb-05-06 01:17 PM
83. Actually they don't... This type of software is a security risk in an enterprise environment. Most Enterprise IT groups would find this behavior unacceptable. More and more shops are moving toward a managed desktop solution (locking down what apps can/can not run on them). I work in the enterprise desktop management industry. The people having 100+ CPUs at their disposal are probably doing so either because
- they manage those desktops,
- they are doing so without the approval on the owners,
- they have gotten everyone they know to run the client with their account information, OR
- they reverse-engineered the network traffic and are sending false results back.

Klutz- 'fes up - you really work for Diebold, don't you!!

191 posted on 02/05/2006 12:38:17 PM PST by BreitbartSentMe (Ex-Dem since 2001 *Folding@Home for the Gipper - Join the FReeper Folders*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson