Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: abb
This is idiotic for the NFL. You can't maintain a sport's popularity by making it unavailable (or difficult to find) to a large segment of your target market.

Just look at Boxing. Back in the '70s, everyone used to watch and talk about every major bout. Then it turned into a cable-only affair and it started a nosedive. Now that it is purely pay-per-view, I don't know anyone into boxing anymore.

12 posted on 01/28/2006 6:07:21 AM PST by inkling
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: inkling

You make a good point. However, "cable" TV for the masses may not be far off. As soon as cable and internet over power lines is perfected, "broadcast" will go away....


20 posted on 01/28/2006 6:24:10 AM PST by abb (Because News Reporting is too important to be left to the Journalists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: inkling
There is a bigger picture here that many don't yet see. Cable TV as we know it is going to go away (not just broadcast). In the very near future, the home computer and traditional TV will be indistinguishable from one another. All media will be available on high speed broadband and consumers will be able to cherry-pick the "channels" they want from the vast ocean of content that will be out there. Think cable "a la carte". Instead of a "package" of basic channels, you simply download the content you want for a nominal fee. So you need never worry about contaminating your home with stuff like CNN, MTV and Peter Jennings again.

We already see the rumblings of this with the TiVo, video iPod and podcasting. Instead of the lowest common denominator crap that we get with broadcasting, we will get narrowcasting to the extreme. If you are a ski nut, there will be channels dedicated entirely to skiing. If you are a weather weenie and can't get enough of studying the GFS models and isobars, you will soon have endless amounts of this nerdy stuff at your fingertips and you'll never have to suffer with "The Weather Channel" again.

All the major technology companies see this tidal wave of change coming and they are investing heavily in set-top boxes and computers that will filter this immense amount of data and deliver to you the content that you really want. Microsoft. Apple. Google. Yahoo! All these companies and many more will be the new media conglomerates.

You will soon have virtually all media ever created available to you on demand. You want to watch some obscure movie from 1931? You can have it delivered to your home in seconds. You want to see a particular episode of "The Waltons" from 1973? No problem. You want to see Game 7 of the 1951 World Series in it's entirety? No problem either.

This is what is coming down the pipe. Literally. And soon.

29 posted on 01/28/2006 7:01:12 AM PST by SamAdams76 (Blizzard coming to Northeast U.S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: inkling
Just look at Boxing. Back in the '70s, everyone used to watch and talk about every major bout. Then it turned into a cable-only affair and it started a nosedive.

I think that had less to do with TV and more to do with anarchy in the governing bodies.

30 posted on 01/28/2006 7:06:07 AM PST by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson