[IllumiNaughtyByNature]

Why don't creationists take issue with gravitational theory?

Can you expound on this topic or link to articles of interest? This line of questioning sounds interesting.

I would like to see an evolutionist paper explaining current global population density on the earth if man has lived/evolved for millions of years.

Freepgards,

K4

[highball]

Can you expound on this topic or link to articles of interest? This line of questioning sounds interesting.

The same creationists who keep insisting "it's only a theory" don't ever extend such "logic" to other scientific theories. If they were intellectually consistent, they should take issue with such theories as gravitation. Or germ theory, for that matter.

But they never do. Wonder why?

I would like to see an evolutionist paper explaining current global population density on the earth if man has lived/evolved for millions of years.

I'm not sure I really understand what you're driving at.

Are you suggesting that current global population density somehow indicates that the earth isn't millions of years old? As in there should be more humans were that the case? If so, you're going to need to provide some math to demonstrate it. That's a new one.

[ElectricStrawberry]

I would like to see an evolutionist paper explaining current global population density on the earth if man has lived/evolved for millions of years

Wrong study....you'd have to go to POPULATION BIOLOGY to understand that, not the Theory of Evolution. Care to rephrase?