Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Republicanprofessor
Oh and I have a question already about romanticism. How is it different from expressionism? Both seem to be painting what they feel instead of what actually "is". Is that a dumb question?
25 posted on 01/23/2006 1:00:07 PM PST by retrokitten (www.retrosrants.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: retrokitten
I have a question already about romanticism. How is it different from expressionism?

Good question.

Romanticism is the 19th century reaction to Neoclassicism, adding a freedom of color and expression. The broken color will influence the Impressionists.

One of my favorite comparisons: Odalisques (Harem women) by the Neoclassical Ingres and the Romantic Delacroix. Also a quite abstract work of the Burning of the Houses of Parliament by Turner, who took Romanticism as far toward abstraction as it could go back then.

Expressionism is a more extreme 20th century movement. Yes, it does express emotion through color and loose brushstrokes.

The Street by Kirchner, and two by Kandinsky: one an early one and one much later and quite non-objective (with no basis in the real world at all). You can see that the use of color and shape is more extreme than the earlier Romanticism.

28 posted on 01/23/2006 2:31:53 PM PST by Republicanprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson