Then she didn't get her money's worth, if they are. My real question is why she would write this article in the first place.
She thinks she's scored some points against the man's wife (who, whatever other qualities she has, is at least married, unlike the author), and against other women in competition for the same pool of men. Her description of the man suggests that she's flattered he chose her over other available women. She's bragging.
Because he didn't call after saying he would?