Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MoochPooch
Yeah, that's the key thing I initially found offensive about this film (later, the rest).

BUT, it's false advertising, no doubt about it and every.blasted.time a studio/distributor resorts to this type of -- even overtly in this particular instance -- misdirecting adverttising, consumers should KNOW they're being misled for whatever other reasons, but that there is certainly some ulterior purpose to a title.

Otherwise, why the false, misleading ad campaign at all? Studios resort to this type of plastic-advertising-surgery to present product that would otherwise be outright passed over by people searching for decent entertainment.

Universal had to manipulate public interest in this film and has worked overtime (to say the least) on hyping this film beyond the predictable, homosexual audience.

It's no more a "love story" than "The Pit And the Pendulum" is, although, granted, the latter title is not filmed. The former is mere "pretty cinematography" adaptation of an ugly short story by the same name, however ("BM").

I'm curious if I'm among the one or few consumers who really mistrusts false, misleading advertising, and those who engage in producing/using it. It strikes a new low for Universal, I have to say, that they'd dare to hype "BM" as they have. All for their dollars...

It's the height of liberal ripoff artistry, to my view: as long as they get their end result (popularity in box office and publicity), they disregard honesty in method.

57 posted on 01/23/2006 12:17:22 AM PST by MillerCreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: MillerCreek

If I film gets enough buzz I always end up seeing it, even if I ordinarily wouldn't. Other good examples for me were The Blair Witch Project, My Big Fat Greek Wedding, Fahrenheit 9/11, and Passion of the Christ. I am weak that way. :)


58 posted on 01/23/2006 12:57:10 AM PST by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: MillerCreek

BUT, it's false advertising, no doubt about it and every.blasted.time a studio/distributor resorts to this type of -- even overtly in this particular instance -- misdirecting adverttising, consumers should KNOW they're being misled for whatever other reasons, but that there is certainly some ulterior purpose to a title.

Otherwise, why the false, misleading ad campaign at all? Studios resort to this type of plastic-advertising-surgery to present product that would otherwise be outright passed over by people searching for decent entertainment.




They pulled the EXACT same trick with Million Dollar Baby-promoting it as a feel-good, female version of "Rocky". Fortunately, I heard Limbaugh and a few others expose the ending, so I was spared being enraged. That new movie with Sara Jessica Parker is the same thing. The previews look like a toatally different movie. I think this type of false advertising pisses me off more than ANYTHING else about Hollywood.


92 posted on 01/24/2006 1:15:11 AM PST by The Foolkiller ( We're only trying to help people make right decisions-with the full force of government, of course.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson