Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: jimtorr
I give it the extra 15,000 years just in case we find something older than the materials that started showing up 35,000 years ago.

Now, about the "jewelry" ~ unless it's been handpolished, carved into a recognizable animal or human form, had a hole drilled in it to hang on a thong, it ain't art ~ just a shiny rock and even crows like shiny rocks.

20 posted on 01/22/2006 8:53:35 AM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: muawiyah; jimtorr
"I would argue that the existence of jewerly that is far older than any cave painting shows that the origion of the esthetic arts is truly primordial."

"Now, about the "jewelry" ~ unless it's been handpolished, carved into a recognizable animal or human form, had a hole drilled in it to hang on a thong, it ain't art."

The 'Hobbits' (on Flores Island) have been pretty much accepted to have been Homo-Erectus and one was buried with an 80,000 year old 'well-worn' shell necklace. 'Art' goes way back.

22 posted on 01/22/2006 10:23:36 AM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson