Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: JeffAtlanta
I'm not sure what the "football move" language is disambiguating.

I think it was meant for situations where the receiver went up for the ball, landed, and then got hit and lost the ball. He got two feet down and held on to the ball momentarily. So is it a catch and fumble, or incomplete?

The rule seems to be saying that merely holding the ball and putting two feet (or the equivalent) down isn't enough. You have to come down with the ball and do something with it before it is a catch.

It is what "do something" means that is in question. Clearly, the "football sense" of nearly all who have commented on the play is that getting up off the turf to try to advance the ball is "doing something."

If the rulebook says otherwise, it should be changed. If the rulebook is unclear, it should be clarified.

SD

217 posted on 01/16/2006 10:44:31 AM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies ]


To: SoothingDave
The official rulebook is available from Borders/Amazon. Now, do I pull the trigger to order it, because the NFL.com digest says nothing about a "football move". Indeed, its definition of a complete forward pass is still the old one, specifically,...
"A forward pass is complete when a receiver clearly possesses the pass and touches the ground with both feet inbounds while in possession of the ball. If a receiver would have landed inbounds with both feet but is carried or pushed out of bounds while maintaining possession of the ball, pass is complete at the out-of-bounds spot."

228 posted on 01/16/2006 11:27:52 AM PST by steveegg (Take two - throw those long knives at the DemonRATs and lieberals - and include the RINOs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson