Source is a pdf transcript where the authors describes why he believes that the recent windows wmf vulnerability was a deliberate backdoor, not a bug.
1 posted on
01/13/2006 1:26:21 PM PST by
dinasour
To: dinasour
Aww, Bill would never do that. Would he?
2 posted on
01/13/2006 1:29:08 PM PST by
Yo-Yo
To: dinasour
If this wasn't Steve Gibson, I'd say, "poppycock".
But I place a fair amount of weight behind anything he has to say on the computer software front.
3 posted on
01/13/2006 1:29:55 PM PST by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(Crime cannot be tolerated. Criminals thrive on the indulgences of society's understanding.)
To: dinasour
My understanding from my reading elsewhere is that it was put in there on purpose years ago simply because it allowed a program to end a transmission via dial-up modem when taking too long to download an image.
It no longer really matters to allow the code execution within a data stream because so many have broadband.
To: dinasour
I just listened to the whole thing. I am a programmer, and it sounds plausible. He defends his position very well. However, Gibson is known for false alarms (raw sockets, anyone?), so I'll have to wait before believing this until Gibson finishes his analysis and we hear the reaction from other credible researchers.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson