Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: teenyelliott
I would think anyone who went to the trouble of following the law, immigrants from Mexico or anywhere else, would be opposed to benefits for those who did not follow the law.

Intuitively that sounds correct. But keep in mind that the Reagan Amnesty turned 3.5 million illegals, who had not followed the law, into legal voting citizens. There have been 7 mini-amnesties (245i) since the Reagan Amnesty that have given citizenship to a few million more illegals who did not follow the legal process but who got citizenship anyway. It would be hypocritical for these many beneficiaries of amnesties, having benefited from them personally, to now oppose them for the current batch of illegals.

That is the big problem with amnesties; they just beget more illegal immigrants who believe there will be future amnesties, and the more amnesties we give, the more voters there are who will support them in the future. They are now a political force that the Republicans believe they have to hispander to.

7 posted on 01/06/2006 12:14:00 PM PST by jackbenimble (Import the third world, become the third world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: jackbenimble

Good, yet crappy and depressing, point.


8 posted on 01/06/2006 12:27:52 PM PST by teenyelliott (Soylent green should be made outta liberals...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson