I do know that there are a few Wikipedians who are also Protest Warriors-I know most of them-who try their best to combat the lies, misinformation, and general ignorance that predominates over there.
It seems like a Sisyphean task, if you ask me.
I've edited a few egregiously wrong Wikis-one on Ralph Ellison, which was riddled with errors, including the absurd assertion that he was a critical part of the Harlem Renaissance-but trying to alter the ingrained Marxist tendencies of Wikipedia seems to be a fruitless endeavor.
I think a better course is to expose that website for what it is, and attempt to educate people who are misled into believing that it is the equivalent of a normal, standard encyclopedia.
Sorry for double submitting I had gone out for a walk with my wife and did not realize that the message had already been sent/
Here is an example of Wikipedia nonsense (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Cuba)
They are attacking "Adam" who is trying to tell them that Cuba is not democratic. Here is the end of one of Scott Grayban's attacks:
"Anyone realize this yet or not that there are only 3 words that is making this article POV ? Communist, Socialist, and Democracy. The same 3 words that comminusts and socialist use in there anti-american propaganda and the same 3 words used in American propaganda. Have we not learned anything at all? Adam is bent on labeling Cuba as a communist state just like the US. Government does. Cuba use the samething in order to provoke hate towards the US. See anything wrong at all ? No one will be happy until 1 is dead and the other wins. Samething for the opposite countries. --Scott Grayban 02:18, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
And I 100% oppose that Adam be allowed to edit on this article seeing that his post on my talk page[18] absolutely proves his willing to do anything to hurt the colabrative NPOV working on this article. --Scott Grayban 02:22, 16 April 2006 (UTC)"
Agreed exposing them is the only way.