If the Encyclopedia Britannica had a built-in process that allowed every random yobo, wild-eyed partisan, ill-informed troublemaker and liberal hachet-man to distort historical and political information printed in its pages before a new edition went to press, how trustworthy do you think most people would consider its publishers?
Not very. Although I'm confused why we're seemingly afraid only of liberal hatchet-men and not conservative axe-women. Joking, I swear. Anyway, I am not going to say that wikipedia is fit for print. Helllllll no. I don't think the problem is liberal bias though, I think its just a lot of work that still needs to be done. Thus my attempt to come here and (poorly, I know) get good new uesrs.