I'm reasonably certain you're using equivocate wrong, and you have a number of questions I've asked you that you havn't responded to. And once again, how the hell can you control a project this big? If we're talking about just controling politically charged articles, its pretty big conspiracy and I would argue, insignificant in the Grand Scheme of Things. At anyrate. you still have yet to provide proof of a large, overal slant, just a few innacuracies with a few articles.
And I'm reasonably certain I've correctly used it to describe your defenses of wikipedia here. Whenever somebody raises a substantive criticism of a specific flaw or bias on wikipedia you dance around it and brush it off as insignificant.