Well, consider the source, right? I mean, can it be that the whole McCarthy stuff was a REAL attempt to get the socialists out of Hollywood? And failed because they mistakenly called them communists?
It would be a believable piece if I could believe in the theory that gays can be monogamous. I don't.
This is not a love story about cowboys. This is about a couple of young men who are hired to work as sheepherders.
Range ridin' cowboys don't spend all day workin' cattle on horseback so they can spend the night curled up with each other in a pup-tent. Hollywood produces movies about this subject matter in settings that are so clearly masculine and pristine because they can't deal with the reality of contemporary homosexual lifestyle. The latter is most commonly a decadent, urban-based orgy of self-destructive behavior, that if truly depicted on the big screen, would leave most of us running into the street to throw-up.
It's a guy like you who encourages poor civil discourse. "Fag"
What is wrong with you?
Why can't you have more civil dialog?
I don't like when liberals call Rush Limbaugh extreme right-wing like it is a disease. I don't like when TV commercials portray white guys as some stupid idiots and every other race as smart. I don't like when it's funny to pick guys grown and everybody laughts at it. it's really silly. at same time, you calling Gays, "Fags" is really sad. Comments like that enables others to be less civil.
I saw this movie and I didn't like it.
The movie was too long and didn't really have a captivating story. I don't know how movie like this wins any awards. South Park, the movie was better than Brokeback. Office Space was far better than this movie. There are hundreds, if not thousands movie far better than this.
The movie does bring some valuable message at the end. People should seize the moment and go for the things that are value to individuals.
Now it's fixed!