Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: HairOfTheDog
The other thing I look for in a feed is that it contains no unidentified "animal" as the meat source, as that almost always indicates horse meat (among other things at the rendering plant) and I refuse to support that.

One thing I've also heard about "crude protein" sources, and this could be urban legend, is that they're not too picky about what constitutes "protein". For instance, say a turkey or chicken has a huge benign (or even malignant) tumor in its body-- that tumor ends up included in the protein source. Pretty ick, and possibly even dangerous, if you ask me.

80 posted on 12/23/2005 10:35:11 AM PST by RepoGirl ("The only ho I'm pimpin' is Sweet Lady Propane." -- Hank Hill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]


To: RepoGirl

Well, I don't know if they'd go to the trouble to single out the tumor, but "animal byproducts" is everything that's left when the good stuff's been taken. Including the yucky bits.

Not that there's anything inherently wrong with that, really. Some of it is undoubtedly of good use.

I simply reject any pet food that lists unidentified 'animals' in it's ingredients because this is codeword for the less than appetizing product of both horse slaughter, and animal disposal (including euthanized pets) that end up at rendering plants.

If the label ingredients say "Beef" or "Chicken" or "Lamb", or "Beef byproducts" that's what it is. If it says "Animal"... well...


81 posted on 12/23/2005 10:41:15 AM PST by HairOfTheDog (Join the Hobbit Hole Troop Support - http://freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net/ 1,000 knives and counting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson