Skip to comments.
Movie isn't just pro-gay, but anti-marriage (Medved on Brokeback Mtn)
JWR ^
| Dec 18 05
| Michael Medved
Posted on 12/20/2005 10:09:17 PM PST by churchillbuff
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
To: churchillbuff
I have been screaming this at the TV every time people discuss this propaganda film. Thank goodness they are talking about it now. The film is an all out assault on marriage.
2
posted on
12/20/2005 10:11:07 PM PST
by
msnimje
(Political Correctness -- An OFFENSIVE attempt not to offend.)
To: churchillbuff
So... how many people have paid to see this stinkeroo?
3
posted on
12/20/2005 10:12:22 PM PST
by
clee1
(We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
To: churchillbuff
And I wish they'd stop calling it a cowboy movie...they are adulterous gay shepards.
4
posted on
12/20/2005 10:13:35 PM PST
by
highlander_UW
(I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
To: churchillbuff
What a
cowboy, huh....

5
posted on
12/20/2005 10:14:27 PM PST
by
SteveMcKing
("No empire collapses because of technical reasons. They collapse because they are unnatural.")
To: churchillbuff
Isn't that the movie about the sheepherders?
6
posted on
12/20/2005 10:15:04 PM PST
by
MNJohnnie
(We do not create terrorism by fighting the terrorists. We invite terrorism by ignoring them.--GWBush)
To: churchillbuff
Guess what? I`ll never know about what this movie is all about because they ain`t getting my time or $$!
7
posted on
12/20/2005 10:15:52 PM PST
by
bybybill
(GOD help us if the Rats win)
To: churchillbuff
Like one of the writers at Polipundit said, if this is the best Hollywood has to offer it's no wonder why nobody wants to watch their movies.
8
posted on
12/20/2005 10:16:41 PM PST
by
conservative_2001
(Defeat Jean Schmidt and Paul Hackett in 2006!)
To: msnimje
I disagree with his statement that the problem isn't that it is pro-gay. That is precisely the problem, because it becomes part of the canon of lies that characterize the gay rights movement. The lie is they can't help themselves.
9
posted on
12/20/2005 10:18:28 PM PST
by
RobbyS
( CHIRHO)
To: churchillbuff
I haven't seen the movie so I will refrain from attacking it too harshly. But from what I have heard adultery does constitute a major part of the films plot. This is an interesting point and one that needs to be made more vocally. As a side note, it goes without saying that adultery or any other sin is not an excuse for violence which must be strongly condemned as well.
10
posted on
12/20/2005 10:18:39 PM PST
by
jecIIny
(Adjutorium nostrum in nomine Domini. Qui fecit coelum et terram.)
To: msnimje
Tell me this "look" wasn't planned and practiced to resemble the president...

11
posted on
12/20/2005 10:20:40 PM PST
by
SteveMcKing
("No empire collapses because of technical reasons. They collapse because they are unnatural.")
To: churchillbuff
We Support Diversity & Tolerance in Adultery!
12
posted on
12/20/2005 10:24:30 PM PST
by
DBeers
(†)
To: churchillbuff
If any readers here have the chance to listen to michael medved on talk radio I encourage you to give him a try.
To: churchillbuff
I'm very grateful to read and hear some in media finally get this most significant offense about this film and to start addressing it.
I've been writing this all along and that is that the film features the adulation and commemoration of very bad character and immorality and that's even before they enter the issue of homosexuality.
With cunning, this wretched writing by Annie Proulx that was adapted to the screen, manipulates people into sympathizing about terrible lack of ethics and worse, attempts to adulate that which is very corrupt.
The film features two people who are responsible for committing with intention and lack of remorse, cruelty and bringing about suffering for those who they seem to "stalk" -- women they marry and then betray without so much as a tear, themselves even, their children, and then one another.
And it's coasting through as being called something it isn't because it engages the acts of male homosexuals.
The film really is a very ugly thing that no one should so much as pay a dime toward. I'm just glad that some among media are now writing about the real issues involved in it.
I heard a fanatical, liberal "film/gossip" columnist earlier on O'Reilly (FOX) who was so shrilly insistent that it was a "wonderful film," that I thought she'd bite someone.
To: msnimje; P-Marlowe
I hear there aren't any cows, no drives of the Herd to Dodge City, no gunfights, no Marshall Dillon or Josie Wales. It's no cowboy movie.
They do have sheep.
So...this is a gay sheep herder movie.
I think the people of Sodom and Gomorrah herded sheep.
15
posted on
12/20/2005 10:37:46 PM PST
by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
To: xzins
Yeah, Gay Shepherds doesn't evoke the emotions the film makers are looking for.
16
posted on
12/20/2005 10:41:08 PM PST
by
msnimje
(Political Correctness -- An OFFENSIVE attempt not to offend.)
To: jecIIny
As a side note, it goes without saying that adultery or any other sin is not an excuse for violence which must be strongly condemned as well. So why say it unless you think some here practice violence against homosexuals?
It goes without saying that we don't practice cannibalism here either but you didn't feel the need to mention that.
17
posted on
12/20/2005 10:42:06 PM PST
by
Tall_Texan
(Santa Claus is an illegal alien.)
To: Tall_Texan
Let me be the first person in FR to condemn the practice of cannibalism.
18
posted on
12/20/2005 11:01:54 PM PST
by
mhx
To: SteveMcKing
You bring up an angle I hadn't considered.....yes, typical Hollywood always has their hidden (and not so hidden) agendas.
I have no intentions of ever seeing this movie....haven't since it was first advertised.
19
posted on
12/20/2005 11:04:34 PM PST
by
Cedar
To: mhx
Who are you to force your morality down the throats of cannibals?!
20
posted on
12/20/2005 11:37:09 PM PST
by
Jeff Chandler
(Peace Begins in the Womb)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson