BAAAAHAAAAAAAAAA!!!!
Did they really think a movie that appeals to such a small proportion of the population would do well?
I haven't seen it ... maybe it's a good story, but the press for this film is stuck on the fact that there are gays in it ... so that's what people are going to think about it; it's a gay cowboy movie.
I can't say I'm surprised that King Kong isn't doing as well as some people thought. It's good, but Lord of The Rings it ain't. And if the producers expected it to be as successful just because of Peter Jackson they need to come back to reality.
Just as the large majority reject Gay Marriage so will they reject this crap and, IMO, that is just as it should be.
I suggest another crappy remake of a TV show that no one watched. That will certainly resurrect Hollywood.
Ahhh-but Butch is sure it will garner it's appropriate awards at the gay film festival. LOL
BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN
Domestic Total as of Dec. 16, 2005: $1,726,000 (Estimate)
Distributor: Focus Features Release Date: December 9, 2005
Running Time: 2 hrs. 14 min. Production Budget: $14 million
MPAA Rating: R Marketing:$7 million
I thought Kong was thoroughly entertaining - this is one ass-kicking ape, plus I agree with Kong - Naomi Watts is worth going on a rampage for..
.........and a bit tooo preposterous. Really, I'm shocked!
I guess we won't be seeing too many gay cowboy movies in the future.
We saw the latest Harry Potter last week. It was late in the run, but the theater was almost empty.
It was good, but not nearly as good IMHO as the earlier ones. A bit too dark and bleak. Even the scenery around the school was darker. Maybe that was deliberate, but I think it's a mistake.
We still haven't seen Narnia, but plan to take the kids sometime soon.
The Grinch Audience that Stole Hollywood's Christmas.
HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA!
Tehy'll give brokeback an oscar for something or another and it will go into profit.
And he sounded positively flaming ...
I saw the trailer (and I use the term loosely)for dirt road mountain when I went to see Walk the line. There was a collective groan that went up from the audience when we figured out what this p.o.s. was about.
So even the best movie is not making enough?
Seems telling that a movie with a known NON pc plotline does very well, while a disgused homosexual porn fantasy is bombing.
People don't want to pay for a Political Correctness. We get that for free from the MSM.
I would not allow my family, nor encourage anyone in my circle of family and friends to view a movie that pushes the homosexual agenda at all costs to the detriment of respect for decent human morals and the betterment of our society.
In Hollyweird, and the coasts no other social agenda gets pushed as much, given the millions of dollars of free media, glowing national daily newspaper editorial comment, and the regular subject of lamestream trash tv.
Nor am I that keen on promoting an elective activity that is highly risky to physical health and mental welfare. But I do not discourage those so inclined to pursue such activity regularly and routinely with reckless abandon as to the consequences. Such foolishness will ultimately lead us to a better gene pool.
A movie where Sarah Jessica Parker plays a conservative. I guess Hollywood is still working on the "suspend your disbelief" thing. Will they wake us up when they get there?
I'll go see Narnia during its first run and plan to see Harry Potter again. None of the other films mentioned interest me, although I might get Kong on DVD when it is released.
King Kong was actually quite good. Maybe not as good as the hype, but very good, nonetheless.