Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dawn53
And therein is the problem, some folks are getting what my son things the answer is and some are getting what I think the answer is.

If, as stated, each antellope averages five offspring over a ten year lifetime, the population of antellopes cannot possibly be stable at 24,000 (or any number). Rather, the population would increase fivefold every ten years, ten-million-fold per century, and by a factor of almost 10^70 over the course of a millenium.

30 posted on 12/05/2005 3:43:28 PM PST by supercat (Sony delinda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: supercat
"the population of antellopes cannot possibly be stable at 24,000 (or any number). "

Pops. generally cycle about some average num. depending on death and birthrate. The problem is simplified by using the average pop. size. In this problem birthrate = deathrate.

33 posted on 12/05/2005 3:49:00 PM PST by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: supercat; dawn53
If, as stated, each antellope averages five offspring over a ten year lifetime, the population of antellopes cannot possibly be stable at 24,000 (or any number).

Oops, didn't see the comment about 5 offspring. Sorry.

If we get 0.5 offspring/year/antelope, and it takes two antelope to produce an offspring, then the birth rate is 0.25 offspring/year/antelope. The death rate then has to be 0.25/year; every antelope has a 25% chance of dying per year. I don't see that as a problem.

34 posted on 12/05/2005 3:50:39 PM PST by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson