Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Grut; faq

That was my answer.

Son thought it had to do with every 10 years, 120,000 are born so in a thousand years 12,000,000 births would give you a rate of 1.2.

Not really a for credit problem, they just turn in their homework, get credit that they've worked on it and then discuss it.


23 posted on 12/05/2005 3:33:22 PM PST by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: dawn53

Sorry, meant 12, not 1.2.

And therein is the problem, some folks are getting what my son things the answer is and some are getting what I think the answer is.

The conflict continues, LOL.


26 posted on 12/05/2005 3:35:30 PM PST by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: dawn53
Son thought it had to do with every 10 years, 120,000 are born so in a thousand years 12,000,000 births would give you a rate of 1.2.

I hate to say it but he may be right. We've been assuming that all the antelope born, lived; but if each one has 5 progeny in ten years and they all live, there's no way the population can stay at 24,000 antelope. So if a lot were killed to hold the population constant, their births add to the number of mutations even though they don't show up as a change in the population.

Thank God I'm a recognized numbers dolt; otherwise I'd be so embarrassed!

64 posted on 12/05/2005 5:54:33 PM PST by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson