I don't know where she lives, but I'm assuming that her deck/backyard is secluded. Otherwise, why would the photographer need to sit back so far and use heavy duty equipment to get a shot of her?
Here's a thought: What if that man was a stalker with a loaded rifle, and Jen was outside weeding her garden? People do have a right to privacy.
She lives on the beach in Malibu, a beach where the public has access (although the libs, including David Geffen, have fought allowing the public to have that access for 20 years.) And the photographer has denied the claim that he was a mile away, pointing out that he'd have to have NASA-worthy satelllite equipment to get such clear pictures from so far away.
Here's a thought: What if that man was a stalker with a loaded rifle, and Jen was outside weeding her garden? People do have a right to privacy.
Red herring. If the students at Penn who had the windows open inside while having sex could not expect to have an alleged right to privacy, somebody whose backyard is the beach certainly cannot expect that.
And I frankly think it quite disingenuous that Aniston, who knows that photographers follow her everywhere, is all in a tizzy because they caught her outside topless. This was a deliberate act to get her names in the papers, and get people talking about her, now that nobody seems to care about how she feels about Brad Pitt anymore.