Posted on 11/29/2005 10:17:36 PM PST by Keli Kilohana
I have not read it. I asked my priest - who did read most of it - if it was worth my time. He said no. He said the "historical background" is basically bogus and the author has events and years out of place.
I smell "sequel". |
you all sound as closed-minded and afraid as the Church has been for thousands of years. The difference today, is that Catholics are no longer simple, uneducated peasants who will follow blindly what Rome tells them.
The popularity of Dan Brown's book is due to the desire of today's believers to find their religion a living faith, that is able to be challenged, dynamic and alive. Not something that died, closed and froze 2000 years ago. That does NOT mean that people believe the fiction of Brown, but that they enjoy the ability to consider possibilities.
I'm truly honored that you joined FR today and felt compelled to jump all over me and my innocuous reply. |
I'll be looking forward to more undeserved and unsubstantiated flames in the future.
Many historians have dismissed Brown's version of events and his central claim that Jesus had a child with Mary Magdalene ad nauseum. IN fact this novel is a derivative of the Kazantzakis work "The Last Temptation of Christ" which was condemned by the Greek Orthodox Chruch...and rightfully so.
No I have not read it and knowing what it's about have no wish to waste my time doing so. I have read a number of critical reviews and like other works of fiction don't have to read it to know whether it's worth my time or not.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.