I love my LCD screen.
Great picture. Everything and it's probably going to end up lasting longer and being cheaper than any plasma screen will.
LCD is the only way to go.
I'm sure it will, although I have come to realize that the longer life of the LCD over plasma may be unimportant, since if you get 7-8 years out of a plasma, you will probably just as soon upgrade to whatever newer technology will be available at that time. If the LCD lasts five years longer than that, who woudld still have that TV with outdated technology that old?
That is fine thinking for just one TV, but I have a need for three and I hate to think I will be replacing 3 TVs X $3,000 bucks each or so every 7-8 years if I keep going for the latest technology.
What would be really cool is to have a 12-14 foot wide screen for a home theatre, surround sound. Some day, the price/technology will be there to do that.
LCD rocks.
I have Direct TV.
What happens with the picture quality when the channel is not a HD channel? How much loss of sharpness happens? Somebody told me that the quality is less than regualar TV when you view a channel on an LCD or plasma that is not being broadcast in HD.
Any truth to that?