[HitmanLV]

That's fine, but has nothing to do with the public policy concern that female sexuality is to be more protected than male sexuality.

It's a total non sequiter. That contraception is available doesn't undermine the value of protecting female sexuality at all.

[Restorer]

It does if your reason for why female sexuality must be protected is that females can become pregnant.

BTW, I happen to agree that females should be protected in this way, it's just that pregnancy has little to do with it.