[Dimensio]

Because it would probably be the 3001st out of 3001st post that you will say isn't credible.

So prove it. Show us that you're right. Whining that we're going to dismiss as an excuse to not provide anything only makes me suspect that you're being less than honest.

[CarolinaGuitarman]

"Whining that we're going to dismiss as an excuse to not provide anything only makes me suspect that you're being less than honest."

Ya think? lol

[nicmarlo]

Why don't you bother someone who has clearly stated, from the beginning, they WANT TO ENGAGE IN A DISCUSSION REGARDING EVOLUTION rather than continue to harass someone who has state, at the outset, they DO NOT WISH TO and has given nothing but reasons WHY THEY DON'T WISH TO? (which reasons include the points you all have proven thus far).

For the third time, as posted back at #112:

I have my own ideas but, just like everyone else, since no one was around, it's all theories/speculation. Credible science includes the scientific method---the ability for anybody to reproduce the "test" and have the same effect. And that's not possible with much of these theories or speculations.

That was in response to my friend's question, at post #105: "What do you think of this evolutionary stuff? Seriously."

For the past 100 posts, you still have not gotten me to answer my friend's question about what I think about evolution....and you've done nothing but harass and demean, divine my intent, call me a liar and other sundry names, simply because I initially made a three sentence statement to a friend. The reasons given why I refuse to state my beliefs/opinions/ideas with specificity have been proven beyond ridiculousness with you, and just with my refusal to post anything beyond my reasons for refusing. You're absurd.