[Junior]

You do realize, of course, that any paper with detailed methodology will be tested by other researchers to determine whether its conclusions are in fact reproduceable. There is no Darwinian Conspiracy because any conspiracy with more than one member will quickly fall apart.

If the anti-Evos will ever submit papers that can be tested and pass those tests then they will have a dog in this hunt. Until then ... well ...

But, if it makes you feel better to feel victimized by some mysterious Grand Conspiracy, then whatever floats your boat.

[nicmarlo]

I haven't stated what my ideas are regarding evolution. Nor have I claimed victimhood. You put that label on me, and the other pro-evolution "person" insinuated I'm a (a) creationist and a (b) coward.

So far, to prove my point, now two of you have been demeaning toward me....and that's JUST for stating I won't discuss my ideas/opinions onthese threads.

It's much worse when someone disagrees with you all, and one doesn't need to read very many evolution threads to know what I'm saying is a fact.

I've read many evolution threads/opinions, but don't post. What you discount as trash scientists/works, I don't, nor does everyone who disagrees with your opinions of their works.

[Virginia-American]

Nic: Do you have any examples of papers that were refused publication?