Scientists 'see new species born'

BBC News Online science editor ^ | 2004 June | By Dr David Whitehouse

[nicmarlo]

ewwwwwwwwwwwww...I was so waiting for that word coward again.

It makes my day when I get to see that from you. : )

[nicmarlo]

Because it would probably be the 3001st out of 3001st post that you will say isn't credible.

[CarolinaGuitarman]

"ewwwwwwwwwwwww...I was so waiting for that word coward again.

It makes my day when I get to see that from you. : )"

Just telling it like it is. :)

[nicmarlo]

And you're still a joke who thinks he can divine intent; did you help with hanging chads in Florida, too?

[Dimensio]

Because it would probably be the 3001st out of 3001st post that you will say isn't credible.

So prove it. Show us that you're right. Whining that we're going to dismiss as an excuse to not provide anything only makes me suspect that you're being less than honest.

[CarolinaGuitarman]

"And you're still a joke who thinks he can divine intent; did you help with hanging chads in Florida, too?"

And you're still a lying coward, whose intent doesn't need to be divined because you made specific statements you were afraid to defend. :)

[CarolinaGuitarman]

"Whining that we're going to dismiss as an excuse to not provide anything only makes me suspect that you're being less than honest."

Ya think? lol

[nicmarlo]

Why don't you bother someone who has clearly stated, from the beginning, they WANT TO ENGAGE IN A DISCUSSION REGARDING EVOLUTION rather than continue to harass someone who has state, at the outset, they DO NOT WISH TO and has given nothing but reasons WHY THEY DON'T WISH TO? (which reasons include the points you all have proven thus far).

For the third time, as posted back at #112:

I have my own ideas but, just like everyone else, since no one was around, it's all theories/speculation. Credible science includes the scientific method---the ability for anybody to reproduce the "test" and have the same effect. And that's not possible with much of these theories or speculations.

That was in response to my friend's question, at post #105: "What do you think of this evolutionary stuff? Seriously."

For the past 100 posts, you still have not gotten me to answer my friend's question about what I think about evolution....and you've done nothing but harass and demean, divine my intent, call me a liar and other sundry names, simply because I initially made a three sentence statement to a friend. The reasons given why I refuse to state my beliefs/opinions/ideas with specificity have been proven beyond ridiculousness with you, and just with my refusal to post anything beyond my reasons for refusing. You're absurd.

[Darksheare]

Knock off the insults and the baiting.

[reasonisfaith]

A major reason for the difficulty in reconciling Intelligent Design theory with traditional science is that the logic of one flows in a direction opposite to that of the other.

Science describes the particular aspects of nature in order to discover more general aspects. Intelligent design would appear to offer a general quality of nature (indeed, the most general) as an explanation for the existence of all particulars. Thus it cannot be tested in the traditional manner.

But the full detail of the nature of man (I am as afflicted as anyone) as revealed in some of these posts shows no variance from that of Biblical teachings.

[CarolinaGuitarman]

"Why don't you bother someone who has clearly stated, from the beginning, they WANT TO ENGAGE IN A DISCUSSION REGARDING EVOLUTION rather than continue to harass someone who has state, at the outset, they DO NOT WISH TO and has given nothing but reasons WHY THEY DON'T WISH TO? (which reasons include the points you all have proven thus far)."

Because, despite your protestations, you HAVE engaged in a discussion regarding evolution. You made specific statements about evolution on this open forum, and them, when we disagreed and asked you for evidence for your specific statements, you whined like a 2 year old.

" For the past 100 posts, you still have not gotten me to answer my friend's question about what I think about evolution..."

Yes you have. Why are you backing away once again from your own statements?

"The reasons given why I refuse to state my beliefs/opinions/ideas with specificity have been proven beyond ridiculousness with you, and just with my refusal to post anything beyond my reasons for refusing. You're absurd."

You have made specific statements about evolution. I am sorry if you are so embarrassed by your own statements. Your cowardice is duly noted.

[nicmarlo]

Another argument.....what and where have I said, specifically, anything about what I think of evolution?

[CarolinaGuitarman]

"Knock off the insults and the baiting."

Mind your own business. He made statements he's afraid to defend.

[Darksheare]

"Mind your own business."

Funny, Nicmarlo's original post taht YOU responded to wasn't to YOU.
So.. Mind YOUR own business to begin with and people won't jump on you.
IF you want to play THAT game, then follow your own advice.

"He made statements he's afraid to defend."

No, she said she had an opinion, and didn't state it because of arrogant and abusive posters like you.
Nicmarlo is a SHE by teh by.

Again, if you want to say "mind your own business" then you shouldn't have posted to nicmarlo who hadn't addressed YOU.

[nicmarlo]

Thanks darks. I tried explaining, several times now, that I initially posted an answer to a friend, not him, which he apparently believes I was lying about, as well.

[Lakeshark]

You must be some kind of true curmudgeon. I can't believe you seem to think you can tee off on someone indiscriminately like that.

For the record, genius boy, it's a she. And from what I can see, she's not only a far more decent person than you ever will be, she's smarter.

And you bring shame and sheer stupidity to this forum. Such a manly man......

[Darksheare]

I like his 'mind your own business' comment, when it is fact that your post that he initially responded to was to a friend and NOT him.

Perhaps he should.. mind his own business?

[nicmarlo]

That would please me, immensely.

[CarolinaGuitarman]

You said the following about evolution,

"Credible science includes the scientific method---the ability for anybody to reproduce the "test" and have the same effect. And that's not possible with much of these theories or speculations."

And then,

"I don't believe the crap I read in Science Journals, they won't print what scientists report who don't go along with their one way evolution ideas."

I asked you what it was that was not allowed into these scientific journals, and you about wet your pants whining.

You made specific, ludicrous claims; claims you weren't able and man enough to defend.

[Darksheare]

Yes, and it would be in keeping with his own 'advice' that I mind my own business.

Seriously, why should I mind 'my own business' when he couldn't be bothered to mind his own business?
If he can't take it, he shouldn't dish it out.