Skip to comments.
BYU Professor thinks bombs, not planes, toppled WTC
Deseret News ^
| November 10, 2005
| E. Jarvik
Posted on 11/18/2005 11:40:33 AM PST by Iconoclast2
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
The hyperlinked paper by the Professor is worth the read.
To: Iconoclast2
He is just reiterating the same crap the loony left does. Nothing new, same crap different mouth.
2
posted on
11/18/2005 11:42:52 AM PST
by
Fzob
(Why does this tag line keep showing up?)
To: Iconoclast2
Must put on my tin hat for this one!
To: Iconoclast2
BYU? They were probably powered by cold fusion.
4
posted on
11/18/2005 11:43:13 AM PST
by
Paleo Conservative
(Hey hey ho ho Andy Heyward's got to go!)
To: Iconoclast2
5
posted on
11/18/2005 11:44:03 AM PST
by
wardaddy
(Captain Spaulding .....the perfect dinner guest)
To: Fzob
I guess we need to ask the lefty loonies what really happened to TWA Flight - 800 on Clinton's watch ?
6
posted on
11/18/2005 11:44:07 AM PST
by
Prophet in the wilderness
(PSALM 53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
To: Iconoclast2
"It is quite plausible that explosives were pre-planted in all three buildings and set off after the two plane crashes which were actually a diversion tactic," he writes. "Muslims are (probably) not to blame for bringing down the WTC buildings after all," Jones writes. Why, aren't Muslims capable of calculating the neccessary explosives, and planting them in advance? Why the racism against Muslims? What a creep! :)
7
posted on
11/18/2005 11:44:46 AM PST
by
Paradox
(Just because we are not perfect, does not mean we are not good.)
To: Iconoclast2
Wow...he should write a book...oops, he is writing a book.
8
posted on
11/18/2005 11:45:01 AM PST
by
GSWarrior
(Posting bandwidth-consuming images since November 2000.)
To: Iconoclast2
He better have tenure. This is as incompetent as it gets for someone in his position.
9
posted on
11/18/2005 11:45:45 AM PST
by
js1138
(Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
To: Iconoclast2
Not Muslims? What were those 19 Arabs doing in the planes that crashed?
The collapse of the buildings can be explained 1) by the huge amount of jet fuel that was burning there from much larger planes than were ever expected or allowed for; 2) the environmentalist decision to stop cladding the steel with asbestos beyond the lower floors; 3) the domino effect of the top floors collapsing onto the floors lower down.
10
posted on
11/18/2005 11:46:12 AM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Paleo Conservative
It wasn't BYU that was promoting cold fusion, it was the University of Utah. This WTC business is bad enough. Please don't blame my alma mater for cold fusion, too.
To: Paleo Conservative
That was the University of Utah that came up with the cold fusion thing. Anyway, this is a totally silly hypothesis. Why even use the planes if bombs were enough to take them down? And it would be incredibly difficult to time the bombs to go off just as the planes hit.
12
posted on
11/18/2005 11:46:21 AM PST
by
MikeA
To: Iconoclast2; Physicist
BTW, this is what happens when you send a (biased) physicist to do an Engineers work...
13
posted on
11/18/2005 11:46:31 AM PST
by
Paradox
(Just because we are not perfect, does not mean we are not good.)
To: Paleo Conservative
don't forget perpetual motion machines located stategically throughout the corridors to create a sympathetic vibration in the steel in conjunction with the lunar pull to counteract the tidal displacement.
14
posted on
11/18/2005 11:47:26 AM PST
by
pipecorp
(Let's have a CRUSADE! , the muslims have already started. 1800 replies and not a single post!)
To: Iconoclast2
15
posted on
11/18/2005 11:47:57 AM PST
by
dfwgator
To: Iconoclast2
Absolute rubbish. I guess it wasn't Muslims who flew the planes into the towers according to this guy. I suspect if you asked him on the QT he'd tell you the Jews did it. There is an excellent review of the collapses by prominent architects who explain that to save money and weight the steel beams were not treated with fire retardant. They show an example of an untreated girder vs. a treated girder and subsequent failure.
What a moron this guy must be. Anything to get their names in the paper and sell a future book.
16
posted on
11/18/2005 11:48:04 AM PST
by
Doc Savage
("Guys, I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more COWBELL...Bruce Dickinson)
To: Iconoclast2
Someone had better find this nut fast and get him back in the institution before he hurts himself.
17
posted on
11/18/2005 11:48:06 AM PST
by
billhilly
(If you're lurking here from DU (Democrats unglued), I trust this post will make you sick.)
To: Iconoclast2
I'm gonna have to thing about that one...
18
posted on
11/18/2005 11:48:15 AM PST
by
Doomonyou
(FR doesn't suffer fools lightly.)
To: Iconoclast2
"Why would terrorists undertake straight-down collapses of WTC-7 and the Towers when 'toppling over' falls would require much less work and would do much more damage in downtown Manhattan?" Jones asks.
What an idiot. They didnt undertake straight-down collapses of the buildings.
They undertook flying giant metal planes loaded with innocents and jet fuel into the buildings.
Fire and gravity decided the manner of collapse after that.
19
posted on
11/18/2005 11:48:22 AM PST
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: Iconoclast2
20
posted on
11/18/2005 11:48:25 AM PST
by
andyk
(Fear my strategery of misunderestimation.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson